ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
When this film came out, I felt the most accurate descriptor of it was "Castaway but with a tiger." I've since changed my mind. It's really more like Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner but with a tiger. Hailed as a visual masterpiece, the effects actually range from incredibly believable to 'Chronicles of Narnia' in terms of how real the animals look. Much like the book it was based on, the film's one biggest flaw stems from having too much sitting around on a boat in between the awe-inspiring bits.
The story follows a boy called 'Pi' and his exciting journey across the Pacific ocean. When Pi's father, who owns a zoo, decides to pack the family and the animals up to move to Canada, things go horribly awry when their ship sinks and only Pi and a small handful of animals escape on a life raft. Little by little, the animals fight to the death on the cramped boat, leaving only Pi alive... and a bengal tiger.
The animals, including the tiger, were all rendered in CGI in lieu of actually putting animal actors through the trouble. These animals on the boat, where we're forced to focus on them, are all so well rendered that it's nearly impossible to tell them apart from the real deal (except when Pi touches one, bit of a disconnect but it only happens in one scene so whatever) Animals in background scenes earlier in the film are more cartoony but for the most part the effects look real and pull off realistic emotions and actions.
The story is emotional and got me to tear up a few times, but the film is true to the book, and the book had a fatal flaw. 'Doldrums' are a phrase used to mean the areas of the sea that are so calm and windless that boats sail through them very, very slowly, and make a journey long and unbearable. Doldrums are what the book and film both have in abundance. There's so much time spent sitting around on a raft I almost wanted to take up scrimshaw just to get the movie to go faster. These doldrums are broken up by the scenes spent at night, where Pi wonders at all the pretty stars and all the bio luminescent fish in the ocean. Apparently everything in the ocean glows in the dark at night. Including whales and stomach acid for some reason. I get why the art department thinks living things that glow are cool (they are) but it's possible to over do it.
While it's no Castaway that'll get you weeping over the loss of a volleyball, it may get you to gasp at the sight of a tiger, or sympathize with a wheedly little vegetarian boy having to brutally kill a fish with a hammer to get enough to eat, or with a computerized tiger with sea sickness. And really, isn't that just as fun?
The story follows a boy called 'Pi' and his exciting journey across the Pacific ocean. When Pi's father, who owns a zoo, decides to pack the family and the animals up to move to Canada, things go horribly awry when their ship sinks and only Pi and a small handful of animals escape on a life raft. Little by little, the animals fight to the death on the cramped boat, leaving only Pi alive... and a bengal tiger.
The animals, including the tiger, were all rendered in CGI in lieu of actually putting animal actors through the trouble. These animals on the boat, where we're forced to focus on them, are all so well rendered that it's nearly impossible to tell them apart from the real deal (except when Pi touches one, bit of a disconnect but it only happens in one scene so whatever) Animals in background scenes earlier in the film are more cartoony but for the most part the effects look real and pull off realistic emotions and actions.
The story is emotional and got me to tear up a few times, but the film is true to the book, and the book had a fatal flaw. 'Doldrums' are a phrase used to mean the areas of the sea that are so calm and windless that boats sail through them very, very slowly, and make a journey long and unbearable. Doldrums are what the book and film both have in abundance. There's so much time spent sitting around on a raft I almost wanted to take up scrimshaw just to get the movie to go faster. These doldrums are broken up by the scenes spent at night, where Pi wonders at all the pretty stars and all the bio luminescent fish in the ocean. Apparently everything in the ocean glows in the dark at night. Including whales and stomach acid for some reason. I get why the art department thinks living things that glow are cool (they are) but it's possible to over do it.
While it's no Castaway that'll get you weeping over the loss of a volleyball, it may get you to gasp at the sight of a tiger, or sympathize with a wheedly little vegetarian boy having to brutally kill a fish with a hammer to get enough to eat, or with a computerized tiger with sea sickness. And really, isn't that just as fun?
Book of Life (Libro de la Vida)
Finally got the opportunity to watch this movie after being super stoked for it since the trailers came out. Without spoiling anything, I’ll go ahead and tell you this much: The entire thing happened because two gods, bored and unsatisfied with their marriage, decided they’d make a bet on a bunch of little kids.
The thing about gods in this movie though, they’re pretty much the same as gods the world over. That is, they don’t much give a care about humans and their lives or plans, and have no qualms what so ever about giving great gifts and powers to small children and placing bets on the outcome of their lives- even
Boxtrolls
It's very seldom you see a film go out of its way to make so many of its characters visually unappealing and still have them command themselves with an unmistakable air of charisma. Even though the characters lovingly display each little greasy hair or smear of dirt, there are many of them you could stand to hug- even if you can almost smell the cheese on them.
Our story takes place in a town called Cheeseridge, a little dairy-centric town that's full of delicious puns and scary looking monsters called Boxtrolls. The boxtrolls live in a commune underground and come out at night to scavenge for trash and spare parts, which they use to create
Maleficent
Before I saw the movie I was bombarded by people saying how good it was because of apparent "feminist undertones" and something to do with a 'rape analogy' for a fairy losing her wings. Well as it turns out, all the rape in the world, analogy or otherwise, probably couldn't make this movie any more interesting. There are perhaps one or two truly emotional moments but most of the performances (except for the mentally unwell obsessive old king) fell rather flat.
First, we have Maleficent's kingdom full of painfully saccharine CGI monsters and landscapes that the actors have a hard time realistically reacting to (protip, you can't really replac
Godzilla
This was a movie I was genuinely interested in seeing. It was also a movie I had no idea what to expect from. I get the feeling that it wanted to be a very formal and stylized, rather subdued action movie but it also wanted a lot of the fun that came with blockbusters like Pacific Rim or Transformers and it didn't quite get the formula mixed exactly how it should have been to take it from "interesting but mostly just ok" movie into the realm of "good film."
The film begins nicely enough with the only white American family on a Japanese island. Well, actually the film begins with this kickass scene of some scientists uncovering a gigantic fos
© 2012 - 2024 CindarellaPop
Comments5
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Your diet needs improvement.